Stem cell research should be allowed

Thanks to the rapid advancements in this field, the potential benefits of stem cells are slowly becoming reality. However, embryonic stem cell research is an extremely divisive topic in the United States thanks to the ethical issues surrounding terminating embryos to harvest the stem cells. In response to this debate, Congress passed the Dickey-Wicker amendment in to prohibit federal funding of research that involved the destruction of embryos.

Stem cell research should be allowed

Quotes on Stem Cell Research Quotes on stem cell research from political, religious and other prominent figures. But many opponents, including some religious leaders, believe that stem cell research raises the same moral issues as abortion.

Furthermore, opponents maintain that scientists have other promising ways of reaching the same goals, including non-controversial adult stem cell research. An Interview with Yuval Levin.

An Interview with Jonathan Moreno of the research point out that there is no substitute at this time for research using embryos.

Stem Cells: Looking Towards the Future

In addition, they say, the research has resulted in the destruction of only a few hundred embryos, making it fundamentally different from abortion, which results in the destruction of millions of human embryos every year.

Different religious groups hold a wide variety of opinions on embryonic stem cell research. For the Catholic Church and many other Christian groups, life begins at conception, making the research tantamount to homicide because it results in the destruction of human embryos.

Stem cell research should be allowed

Other religious groups do not take a position on the issue, and some, including many Jewish and more-liberal Christian groups, support embryonic stem cell research. National polls indicate that a slim majority of Americans support the research.

The same poll found that 35 percent say it is more important not to destroy embryos. As the pace of the cutting-edge research quickens and the prospect for cures moves closer to reality, advocates on both sides of the debate see the possibility that, within a few years, scientists will find a way to harvest stem cells without destroying embryos.

In lateresearchers in Wisconsin and Tokyo announced they had transformed ordinary human skin cells into those that appeared to have the same properties as embryonic stem cells. Religious leaders hailed the discovery as proof that the destruction of embryos is unnecessary.

Scientists around the world quickly cautioned that, although promising, the new research did not guarantee that adult stem cells could successfully be transformed into pluripotent cells. Many, including James Thomson, the researcher who led the team at the University of Wisconsin, publicly argued that embryonic stem cell research should continue.

In Europe, only the United Kingdom, Sweden and Belgium allow all forms of embryonic stem cell studies. On the other end of the spectrum, Austria, Ireland, Poland and Lithuania have outlawed all forms of stem cell research.

Germany and Italy have criminalized the extraction of stem cells from human embryos, but scientists are permitted to conduct research on stem cells created elsewhere. Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Spain and the Netherlands restrict scientists to producing stem cell lines from surplus embryos that fertility clinics plan to destroy.

Political Debate in the U. In the United States, the primary question is whether the federal government should fund embryonic stem cell research. Unlike Japan and most European countries, no federal laws actually limit the research, although six states — Arkansas, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, North Dakota and South Dakota — prohibit the creation or destruction of human embryos for medical research.

At the national level, most Democratic politicians favor federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, including Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois.

InObama voted for legislation that would have allowed federal funding for stem cell research using embryos slated to be discarded from fertility clinics. Bush vetoed the bill.

The issue has split Republican lawmakers. Some oppose any research that involves the destruction of human embryos. Sam Brownback and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, for example, are vocal opponents of the research. Others, including Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain of Arizona, favor certain aspects of the research.Stem Cell Therapy for Kidney DiseaseLong Lasting · Life Changing · Team Of Experts · See If You Qualify.

REJUVENATION CENTER - Stem Cell Treatment. Due to the nature of embryonic stem cell research, there are a lot of controversial opinions on the topic. Since harvesting embryonic stem cells necessitates destroying the embryo from which those cells are obtained, the moral status of the embryo comes into question.

Stem cell: Stem cell, an undifferentiated cell that can divide to produce some offspring cells that continue as stem cells and some cells that are destined to differentiate (become specialized). Stem cells are an ongoing source of the differentiated cells that make .

Stem Cell Journal Research and Medicine is an open access journal with comprehensive peer review policy and a rapid publication process. The journal mainly focuses on the basic research, clinical studies and translational research in the fields of stem cell biology and regenerative medicine.

An emerging stem-cell-derived treatment designed to preserve and potentially restore vision in people with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) has demonstrated a favorable safety profile in an ongoing Phase I/II clinical trial at the University of California, Irvine.

The therapy is being developed by the.

Should embryonic stem cell research be allowed? | ashio-midori.com